how long did you book your photographer for?
Posted 08 April 2009 - 11:32 AM
This reminds me of a discussion I had yesterday as I met with a client. Initially, she thought they would only need five hours coverage, as it is a smaller, more intimate type wedding with just family attending. However, after going over the timeline of the day, she realized that she will actually need about 6 hours, as they want to capture the getting ready time, as well as some of the reception. She was glad that we went over the events of the day in detail, as she now knows she will need another hour or so more than she initially thought.
So, my suggestion is to add at least one or maybe even two hours to the amount of time you think you'll need, so you can allow for things taking longer than you initially planned.
Hope this helps, and happy planning!
Posted 08 June 2009 - 01:37 PM
I think more time is better, b/c there may be some great moments when people are more relaxed and letting loose. And the day will go by quickly as others have mentioned here.
Posted 11 June 2009 - 01:59 AM
Posted 15 June 2009 - 07:07 PM
Posted 16 July 2009 - 08:29 PM
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:56 PM
In saying this, some photographers don't advertise hourly rates or time packages. If you are concerned about your time limitations, I would suggest asking around for photogs that simply offer "coverage of your day".
Posted 29 July 2009 - 10:42 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users