Jump to content

Photo

Is it wrong.


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 daizyduke

daizyduke
  • Jr. Member
  • 230 posts

    Posted 01 May 2011 - 05:01 PM

    Is it wrong to to tell anyone about the possibility of an AHR until after the majority of people have booked/comitted/decided if they are going to the destination wedding? 

     

    I just don't want people to feel like, well if there is going to be something at home, why go somewhere else. 



    #2 redginger

    redginger
    • Jr. Member
    • 360 posts

      Posted 01 May 2011 - 06:24 PM

      I don't think it's wrong to tell people that you may decide to have an AHR after you have certainty around guest bookings for your destination wedding. It's already a bit stressful planning for the wedding...I'm sure you don't need this extra stress of an AHR planning so early in your wedding plans.



      #3 Avelyad

      Avelyad
      • Jr. Member
      • 156 posts

        Posted 01 May 2011 - 07:05 PM

        we have mentioned a BBq possibilty when people seem to hem and haw, but not until then - we really want people to consider coming first, then we will see how it goes....



        #4 daizyduke

        daizyduke
        • Jr. Member
        • 230 posts

          Posted 02 May 2011 - 07:57 AM

          Thanks ladies,

           

          I don't want to be mean.  If it were up to me there would be no AHR.  I don't need more than one wedding, and fell like who ever wants to be there, will be there.  However, my mother wants an ATR, so I am doing it for her.  I just worry that it will be at the expense of the wedding I actually want. 



          #5 royalbride610

          royalbride610
          • Jr. Member
          • 172 posts

            Posted 02 May 2011 - 08:34 AM

            I think that you could mention that you might have something casual, but right now you're focusing on planning your DW.  And just say you will let them know when you and your fiance decide.  You don't have to tell people, but if your considering it, it'd be nice to just give them a heads up of a maybe.

             

            I wouldn't be having an AHR either, but we'd already made a large deposit on a hall so we thought we might as well use it instead of letting it go to waste.  But ultimately the decision is yours, you have to pay for it so if you don't want to do it, don't.



            #6 Aphrodite

            Aphrodite
            • Jr. Member
            • 178 posts

              Posted 06 May 2011 - 09:53 AM

              I'm actually planning on sending out invites for the AHR months later.

              My wedding is November 11, 2011.  For the DW I'm asking for a RSVP for mid-July because the hotel needs a guest list for August.  My AHR is booked for November 26, 2011.  I'm going to send out invites for this in August or September.

               

              That way I don't have to worry about people scrapping my actual wedding in favour for the AHR and it's a little less confusing with the invitation wording, etc.



              #7 PurpleUnicorn

              PurpleUnicorn
              • Jr. Member
              • 305 posts

                Posted 25 July 2011 - 08:24 PM

                i dont think its wrong. i kind of did the same thing....although i dont think it  resulted in any more guests for my DW!  i think people are going to come if they want to come and not if they don't!



                #8 clgriffi7

                clgriffi7
                • Banned
                • 630 posts

                  Posted 26 July 2011 - 04:10 AM

                  There is no right and wrong in this situation.  I personally put the date for the wedding and the AHR on the STD and the invites.  Though I would love to have as many people as possible at the destination wedding, I don't want to mislead anyone into spending money they may not really have. 

                   

                  My fear of holding out on the AHR info would be:  a guest is on the fence as to whether they can afford the DW and decide to come because that would be the only way to support my fiance & I and then be upset (and financially strapped) when they found out later there was an AHR.

                   

                  Also - I have to say that having a smaller group attending our wedding (it looks like 24 or 25 adults + 3 kids + B&G) is keeping the stress way down financially and logistically.  I originally thought I would want 40-50 ppl to make it more of a party, but having the smaller group means I can do more for each guest (like take everyone on a nice excursion).



                  #9 AfricanVenus

                  AfricanVenus
                  • Jr. Member
                  • 328 posts

                    Posted 26 July 2011 - 05:06 AM

                    I decided to have an AHR only for people who weren't able to attend the wedding or weren't invited. That way, the party had a specific purpose. Those who were invited, committed right away because they wanted to be there. I did it that way, because I wanted to focus on my wedding and doing it a certain way. People who couldn't come, but wanted to, now felt they had an opportunity to celebrate with us. I would present the AHR as an option for those who want to, but can't. To do so, it's about strategic timing. Let people commit to the wedding first, and then talk AHR. Explain that you don't want to leave them out. Be really diplomatic about it. Make it clear that it is not "another wedding". Just a party to look at the pics...real chill.


                    Heaven endures and the Earth lasts a long time, because they do not live for themselves. ~~Our story endures: June 25, 2011~~
                    Wedsite: kosha.projectwedding.com




                    0 user(s) are reading this topic

                    0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users