Jump to content

Photo

which wedding band should I get?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#11 Janet

Janet
  • VIP Member
  • 7,459 posts

    Posted 15 April 2007 - 12:48 AM

    I LOVE #1, #2 is my 2nd fave, and #3 is my least, just because the diamonds are smaller :)

    Well, not that the diamonds are small, cause i have a zillion tiny diamonds on mine, but that the prongs are too big. does that make sense?

    #12 gkashmira

    gkashmira
    • Sr. Member
    • 1,962 posts

      Posted 15 April 2007 - 03:16 AM

      I actually picked #1 because I love the look of the actual band - a bit more antique and shiny :)

      I actually bought my band today and it's a lot like #1 except it doesn't have the side diamonds. I helped try on a few that did but honestly it just didn't seem necessary - you couldn't see them at all when the band was on.
      Kashmira & Dan
      Happily married since June 16, 2007
      http://i95.photobuck....a/IMG_0769.jpg
      Our mini-video: http://www.bajavideo...m/Kash_Dan.html
      Photo slideshow: http://www.tomasbarron.com/recent.php

      #13 *JillD*

      *JillD*
      • Sr. Member
      • 5,112 posts

        Posted 15 April 2007 - 10:54 AM

        Quote:
        Originally Posted by Susan101207
        I love the "vintage" look of #1. I see what the other girls mean about it rubbing on your ER though. I know that happens to a certain extent with all WBs and ERs, but the diamonds on the side might exaggerate the prob. Have you thought about solding your ER and WB together? Don't know if you could do that with #1. I still really like #1...but #3 would be my second choice...and probably the better, more practical choice. Still has some of that vintage feel. Let us know what you decide!
        #1 is my favorite too, I really like the vintage look too. I had thought about soldering them together but if I got this one, I wouldn't be able to which would be okay.

        Quote:
        Originally Posted by host
        ok, just a heads up...i have a wedding band with a bunch of small diamonds and debated between an infinite or not but someone told me that infinites are hard to resize, etc. so i got a ring with diamonds around most of it.

        the small diamonds are such a PITA to keep clean...i now wish i just had a simple band...if i had an infinite band i would be soo annoyed.

        just my 2 cetns
        I think all of these are 1/2 way around, at least thats what I hope because I've heard the same thing with resizing of eternity bands. Does yours go half way around? I know my ering is so dirty right now I need to get it cleaned!

        Quote:
        Originally Posted by JANET1111
        I LOVE #1, #2 is my 2nd fave, and #3 is my least, just because the diamonds are smaller :)

        Well, not that the diamonds are small, cause i have a zillion tiny diamonds on mine, but that the prongs are too big. does that make sense?
        I love #1 too, I just can't figure out if its the most practical. I do know what you're saying about the prongs being too big on #3, I like that it has the milgrain edge to give it that antique look, but I wish the diamonds were more the pave setting of the first one. I might have to do a little more research to see if I can find one like that on another site.

        Quote:
        Originally Posted by gkashmira
        I actually picked #1 because I love the look of the actual band - a bit more antique and shiny :)

        I actually bought my band today and it's a lot like #1 except it doesn't have the side diamonds. I helped try on a few that did but honestly it just didn't seem necessary - you couldn't see them at all when the band was on.
        I keep thinking this too, that you won't even be able to see the side diamonds, maybe if I wasn't going to wear my ering.

        I asked steve last night which one he liked and he didn't like #1, he thought #3 was best.

        If I could just find one that was a combination of #1 & #3 I would be really happy. And then I go back to liking the clean lines look of #2 as well, hahaha!

        #14 lulubelle

        lulubelle
        • Newbie
        • 148 posts

          Posted 15 April 2007 - 01:43 PM

          I LOVE #1. They are all pretty but the first one is beautiful. I love the diamonds on the side.

          #15 anaderoux

          anaderoux
          • Sr. Member
          • 3,220 posts

            Posted 15 April 2007 - 05:20 PM

            I'd but #1 if it matched my e-ring.. I love it..

            #16 LCBride2007

            LCBride2007

              VIP Member

            • VIP Member
            • 24,768 posts

              Posted 15 April 2007 - 05:28 PM

              i am voting for #3 - i can't remmeber what your e-ring looks like, but it sounds like it might go best w/it IMO.

              #17 DEE1978

              DEE1978
              • Newbie
              • 134 posts

                Posted 15 April 2007 - 07:31 PM

                Jill,
                I like #1 but then again my ER is an antiquey setting.

                #18 Jessalyn

                Jessalyn
                • Sr. Member
                • 1,876 posts

                  Posted 15 April 2007 - 09:30 PM

                  I vote for #1, but I think I'm partial because my ER and WB look very similar, but with princess cut stones on the top.

                  but, I've also worried about the side stones and if you wear the band with your ER,. you won't even see the side stones too much.

                  my second choice is #3....I love the millgraining!
                  My new man....Donovan

                  Wedding photos and avatar by Jonathan Thrasher Photography - www.jthrasherphoto.com
                  Our wedding slide show www.jthrasherphoto.com/slideshows/jessalynhttp://tickers.Ticke....k/27c1/age.png

                  #19 tvt

                  tvt
                  • VIP Member
                  • 4,812 posts

                    Posted 16 April 2007 - 09:28 AM

                    I like them all! But I would go with #2. My e ring is a semi solitaire (it has two sapphires set under the diamond so you can't see them from the top so it looks like a solitaire) with a plain band as well and I tried on some wedding bands with detailing like #3, and it kind of looked out of place next to my e ring.

                    #20 TATrisha

                    TATrisha

                      VIP Member

                    • VIP Member
                    • 12,377 posts
                    • Wedding Date:April 11, 2008
                    • Wedding Location:Gran Bahia Principle Akumal
                    • LocationWisconsin

                    Posted 16 April 2007 - 10:39 AM

                    I choose #2. I really like #3, but reading the description of your e-ring, I don't think that much detailing will look good with such a simple ring next to it. So for me, #1 is completely out of the question.

                    ~Trisha~

                    Destination Wedding Photographer & Travel Agent
                    www.faberphotography.com - My latest destination wedding photos can be found HERE

                    Disney Specialist  /  Bride & Groom Fly FREE Promotion

                     
                    Looking for a travel agent that KNOWS DISNEY?  We are an award winning travel agency and you can read our reviews here.
                     
                    Awards and recognition: 
                    Palace Resorts Winner "Top Travel Agent", "Top Homebased Travel Agency" PRO Platinum Agency (Top Award)   |  AMResorts Master Agent & Top Agency  |  Karisma Hotels Diamond Level 5 (highest production), Top 10 Azul Weddings, Top Wedding Coordinator | Wright Travel & Karisma GIVC Benefits | Travel Impressions Best of the Best Globe Winner   |   Apple Vacations Golden Apple Winner  
                    sml_gallery_206696_17612_13451.pnggallery_206696_17572_8409.jpg    sml_gallery_206696_17572_1003.jpg
                    Vendor rules are HERE! Please read!  If you are a vendor and looking to advertise your business, please email ads@bestdestinationwedding.com.





                    0 user(s) are reading this topic

                    0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users