Did you pick your resort based on being able to have outside photographers?
Posted 25 May 2009 - 06:21 PM
Did you have a resort in mind then change it because they don't allow outside photographers ?
Please comment in this thread on why or why not it was important to you, if you did not use a resort because of the policy please let us know which resort and where you booked instead!
I am hoping to use this to show what effect the no outside photographer/videogrpher policy may have to certain resorts!
Posted 25 May 2009 - 07:21 PM
Pictures and video capture the moments of a bride and groom's special day. Couples spend a lot of money on photographers and videographers, sometimes even more than the actual cost of their wedding. In my opinion, photography and videography are key components to any wedding, especially a DW where by circumstance some family and friends cannot attend. Therefore pictures become that much more important to capture the day to share with the people who wanted to attend but could not.
Posted 25 May 2009 - 07:47 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:16 PM
Thanks for starting this poll. I have often wondered this and I hope that you get lots of responses.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:23 PM
When we found this out and decided we really wanted (and preferred) to do this. We were really glad we could take our own photographer. I can honestly say that if I had been told I couldn't bring my own photographer I think I would have given up my $200 deposit to switch resorts to one that would allow it. There are plenty of resorts to choose from on Jamaica that are beautiful options.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:27 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:52 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:08 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:26 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:33 PM
As far as "based our decision on which property on being able to bring our photographer" I wouldn't say we did that, but rather just paid the cost of doing so.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users