| Originally Posted by GeminiLibra |
It is buffet but I was wondering if it were possible to not do it buffet style and have servers. Sorry I didn't explain it correctly, but it really isn't a huge deal I was just curious if people cared about serving themselves.
Paying a waitstaff??
Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:11 PM
Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:15 PM
Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:16 PM
Posted 10 June 2008 - 08:11 PM
I don't think the $500 is worth it to have a served meal. Stick with buffet.
Posted 10 June 2008 - 08:32 PM
Posted 10 June 2008 - 09:05 PM
| Originally Posted by bobbi-francis |
I'm actually paying the additional $500 for waitstaff, but that's just me. I wanted it to feel a little like a traditional wedding. I have the plantation restaurant for 4 hours so i dont think it should take up too much time to serve 85 guests.
Posted 10 June 2008 - 09:19 PM
that is the attitude
I've been to plenty of traditional weddings with a serve yourself buffet. I like to heep on more of what I like & less of what I don't like.
I personally would rather put the $500 towards a group excursion or something more fun. My guests are all really laid back & would probably not understand if I paid $500 for a server.
Posted 11 June 2008 - 12:27 PM
Posted 11 June 2008 - 01:06 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users