Posted 30 December 2007 - 05:17 AM
Do you think that it is rude or improper to send pictures to my photographer on pictures that I want her to take?
Also does anyone know roughly how much a videographer would be just for approx 3 hours? I am debating on if I need one or not.
Thank you in advance everyonbe.
Posted 31 December 2007 - 02:02 AM
BUT...you should ask to see an entire wedding...and that is what you can expect for your wedding set. but i think talking to the photographer to make sure your on the same page as far as the tone, the style shot.
The difficult thing is that it is easy for you to copy your favorite photos from a variety of weddings and mix them all together and hope that is what you get...but in reality, this is your wedding and your wedding images should be creative, orginal and unique to you and your husband/wife...
if that makes any sense?
Posted 31 December 2007 - 09:57 AM
Posted 31 December 2007 - 10:27 AM
Posted 31 December 2007 - 12:28 PM
A quality videographer will shoot with 2 or more cameras and shoot in high definition. Delivering in High Def is a bit tricky and expensive now but the high def cameras will produce far superior results on a standard DVD. The new HDTVs really show the flaws in obsolete or cheap cameras.
If you choose to do it yourself I suggest two camcorders. One on a tripod near a speaker for a steady shot with good sound. You can edit this together with a handheld camcorder getting the close ups and have a decent video. Nobody can watch more than 3 minutes of handheld camcorder video with bad sound.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users